The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

  • @ddkman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -751 year ago

    This really depends. If the building is rentable for 5000 than it is. Like it or not.

    • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      311 year ago

      If 2500 was reasonable back then, then it still is reasonable right now.

      Unless gigantic upgrades were performed to the house that warrant a 1000 price hike, which I highly doubt.

      Just because the market is fucked doesn’t mean you get to make the market even worse.

      • @ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Except the price of food building materials renovation costs went up by about 100% where i live realistically. So a landlord isn’t going to just take the fact that their 2500 whatever is now only worth 1700 whatevers.

      • @Rocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If accepting a lease on a post-2018 construction, knowing that no rent control was in force, was reasonable then, it is still reasonable now. Live with your choices.

        • @cazsiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          This isn’t living with ones own choices. This is having others choices thrust into you and having to deal with their greed.

          • @Rocket@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There is no obligation to enter into a tenancy knowing that the landlord can jack the prices up on a whim. There is plenty of choice – one can opt to move into a unit constructed before 2018 instead, or, in newer construction, one can make it a contractual condition of the tenancy to have an independently negotiated “rent control” in force.

            To ignore all of that at the time and then cry about it later because the risk taken didn’t work out is just plain antisocial behaviour. We invented contract law exactly to prevent these kinds of surprises. If you want to play some other stupid game instead, expect to win stupid prizes.

        • erg
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          having no rent control is never reasonable. People only accepted places without rent control because all other options are shit too

          • @Rocket@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Exactly. To accept a lease on a property that you know doesn’t have automatic rent control, and to not contractually obligate the landlord to long-term price controls in that rental agreement, is reckless. They took the high risk gamble and lost. Such is life. But to then complain that their high risk scheme, which was done to screw over other renters who are more careful, didn’t work out is plain antisocial behaviour.

    • @MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      You like profiting from others misery. It’s not illegal and it’s not generally even frowned upon but it’s still shitty and you have to own it

      • utopianrevolt
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        You forgot to add an overly pretentious “like it or not” at the end of your reply.

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      You realize that there’s people living in these apartments right? You know there’s a housing crisis right now that’s fueled by housing investors from all over the world and shit like Airbnb and corporate greed, right?