• @nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -1721 year ago

    Did that person draw that specific frame all by themselves? If no then it’s still using others’ copyrighted work + own input.

    • @winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      40
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s absolutely incredible that people are such bootlickers for billionaire projects that they’ll see this tremendous slam dunk and then go to the comments trying to defend the person who just got dunked. Like, seriously, you really think that’s going to convince people?!

      • @Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah the ball went in the hoop, but this is also essentially trashing the entirety of meme and edit culture.

      • @nxfsi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -151 year ago

        Funny how Luddite paint pigs were perfectly fine when Microsoft’s dalle was the only player in the game and didn’t start screeching about ai until after open source image generation software got released. And yet you conservatives still call people bootlickers.

          • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            271 year ago

            So what you’re tell me all artists in history should be sending residuals to the first caveman to draw on a wall?

            You know what, sure, let’s go with that. Maybe copyright enforcement is the way to discovering time travel in this reality.

            • at_an_angle
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              I will issue you a challenge: create art inspired by absolutely nothing and 100% orginal.

              • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Why would I agree to a challenge that I know is impossible?

                I thought the implications of my sarcastic comment about the first cave painting was that there is no 100% original or inspiration-free work of art at this point in human history. However, there is a difference between plagiarism and transformative work.

                Dante’s Inferno is based off the Bible. Does that mean Dante should have given all credit and proceeds of his sales to the Church? Jesus? God? That’s what my cave painting joke was trying to highlight.

                • at_an_angle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Dude, I’m sorry.

                  I wasn’t drunk or hungover yet posted a reply to the wrong person. That was meant for the touching grass user.

                  I totally agree with you.

            • @jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Don’t be silly, residuals only last until 70 years after the artist’s death… that caveman died thousands of years ago. /s

            • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -291 year ago

              Absolutely. If you create a piece of art. Its precious and anyone who ever looked at that piece owes the artist something. This debt should be paid for life and beyond for all time. End of story

      • @herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        371 year ago

        The only true artist is Ooonga Baloonga, who invented art when he drew something roughly resembling an animal on a random cave wall 6 bajillion years ago. Everything since then is derivative bullshit, lifeless imitations of his unique vision.

      • @TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s the point. It’s supposed to be a facsimile of s man. The whole plot of the show is a critique of comic book tropes and the consequences of idolizing superheroes etc