• pjhenry1216
    link
    fedilink
    632 years ago

    Honestly, I could see it being both. HB isn’t entirely cold-hearted corporatism.

    • @FrankFrankson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      862 years ago

      Uh in 2017 Humble Bundle Inc. got bought out by IGN Entertainment which is owned by Ziff Davis …so yeah it’s part of a big shitty corporation.

      • @BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        492 years ago

        Humble has coincidentally been a lot more shit since then too. I used to buy game bundles all the time, now it’s $20 to get maybe 2-3 games worth playing instead of $15 for 5-6 indie titles that were genuinely good.

        • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I stopped buying their game bundles when they started using Steam keys for everything instead of letting you download DRM-free.

          I still sometimes buy their book and “software” bundles, though, but I always check to see how they’re going to be redeemed.

      • CALIGVLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        I can’t be the only one that thinks IGN, a game reviewing website, owning a publisher and storefront seems utterly immoral, right?

        • Final Remix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Wasn’t IGN the shithole that had the Kane & Lynch ads plastered everywhere, plus a totally 100% unbiased review?

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      302 years ago

      They’re charity as a corporate marketing tool.

      Which makes them a lot of money (including a lot from me).

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They could easily make more money with the same image by limiting how much revenue goes to the charities. You can choose to not give them anything.

        I’m not saying they aren’t in it for the money. Most people need to make money to survive. But I think it’s disingenuous to say they don’t care at all. I think they do good and I feel many others agree.

        A corporate marketing tool that costs such a large portion of your revenue is an inefficient tool. There must be some other value in it for them.

        • chameleon
          link
          fedilink
          462 years ago

          You haven’t been able to give them nothing for over 2 years now. For this particular bundle, the minimum split for Humble is 30% and the default split is an insane 45% to Humble, 50% to the company and 5% to charity.

          Humble is unfortunately still coursing by on their old reputation of being charity-friendly, but they changed to be one of the worst players around years ago. That goodwill from back then has really been depleted.

          • @fraydabson@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            152 years ago

            Yeah I almost always do minimum for humble and majority charity with a little left over for the provider.

        • @raptir@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          I have no idea what their motivation was, but the charity angle is a great way to differentiate themselves from Steam. I would guess they would not be so successful without it.

      • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’m fine with them even without the charity honestly. They sell DRM free books for cheap which is the only way I’m actually going to pay for digital books. We need more of that.