Not a great look for Microsoft

  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    329 months ago

    Honestly. This is a fine look for Microsoft. This is inside baseball executives trying to make sure the lineup on their game pass platform is appealing to people throughout the year. They’re going to make bad predictions, but they’re not doing it out of spite or evilness, they’re just trying to maintain engagement in their game pass.

    You would see similar discussions behind any other subscription platform. Did they underestimate it sure, but their job is to predict, so they’re going to have to make good estimates and bad estimates.

      • Gyromobile
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        The issue isn’t THAT you missed. It’s WHY you missed.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      That’s kinda like saying an engineer builds good bridges and bad bridges.

      Ok, not that, but it’s still their job to get almost all predictions at least CLOSE to right, so this is the definition of failing to do their job.

      • @MrCharles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        Maybe, but most prediction based jobs have a middling success rate.Missing this big is always significant, but not catastrophic in this case.

        • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          59 months ago

          When you have a history of failing and than you go and call Crosby second rate. It is actually quite catastrophic, it proves (again and again) that they have zero idea of the market they are in.

        • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          I guarantee that at least some of them would have been fired if they made the same magnitude mistake in the opposite direction, though, and unless they have specific safeguards to avoid overestimate that aren’t in place for underestimates, they WILL.

          • @jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I don’t think they did a bad job at all. They wanted to have a lineup to keep their users engaged. If they underestimate one, even significantly, they still succeed because they insured they had a lineup to keep their users engaged. They’re hedging their bets.

            Not to mention lorian, themselves underestimated the success, because overestimating causes more problems. And lorien and Microsoft negotiator rate for game pass.

            • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              09 months ago

              You wouldn’t happen to work in PR, would you? Because the way you keep insisting on focusing on something completely irrelevant to the criticism while still briefly acknowledging the criticism as an aside is actually quite dextrous and would probably work on a lot of people 😄

              • @jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Nope. I’m working against the thesis of “not a great look for Microsoft” the op posted.

                I’m very much glad bg3 is a huge success, we need more RPGs with depth and impact. I’m just not convinced in this circumstance MS is the boogyman.

                • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  39 months ago

                  Not in this specific situation, but their repeated failures should maybe tell them that their view on the market is incorrect.

                  History keeps repeating itself with them.