@Gingernate@programming.dev to Unixporn@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoIm going to get banned for thisprogramming.devimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1552arrow-down1107
arrow-up1445arrow-down1imageIm going to get banned for thisprogramming.dev@Gingernate@programming.dev to Unixporn@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-square@PowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilink0•edit-22 years agoI am not a greybeard expert with deep bash history, but I though the posix compliant aspect of PowerShell was a very recent, though apparently not perfect, achievement even if “technically” NT was POSIX compliant by some specific definition in 1993.
minus-square@Zeth0s@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•edit-22 years agoAs far as I understand, these are posix requirements https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18 Powershell is not compliant with that document even now in the interactive part. Wsl2 is, as one can istall a standard Linux shell
I am not a greybeard expert with deep bash history, but I though the posix compliant aspect of PowerShell was a very recent, though apparently not perfect, achievement even if “technically” NT was POSIX compliant by some specific definition in 1993.
As far as I understand, these are posix requirements https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
Powershell is not compliant with that document even now in the interactive part. Wsl2 is, as one can istall a standard Linux shell