• @BarelyOriginal@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I would love a “robotax” where automation is encouraged, but with the caveat that it is also heavily taxed. Not so much that it’s cheaper to have employees, but enough so that the people who’s jobs have been replaced can still get an income. Be it through major subsidies or the ultimate subsidy: universal basic income

    • @LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Your instinct to use a systemic solution is good. My concern would be the tax gives corporations the wrong incentive (Some percentage of jobs could be automated but would still be cheaper to hire people). As another approach I like worker cooperatives because if they automate some task the financial benefit goes to the employees. The problem is there aren’t enough large scale worker co-ops, so I’d like to see them get tax advantages, preference on government contracts, grants, etc to drive their development.

      • @LTFRANTZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the idea is the tax applies only to any money saved through automation. So if an employee costs $2500/mo and automation costs $500/mo, the company saves $2000/mo. Lets say the tax is 75%, the government takes $1500/mo from the company, but the company is still saving an extra $500/mo from automating, so they are still incentivized to do so.

        Then that money from the tax could be used to pay for things like job retraining courses for people displaced by automation, or even maybe UBI.