Under the pretense of fortifying digital security in the United States, newly proposed legislation seeks to transform the United States Postal Service (USPS) into a hub for digital IDs. Senators Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Bill Cassidy, Republican, have put forth the bill known as the Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act. The proposed legislation opens new discourse on digital privacy and the potential for abnormal surveillance measures, sparking debate over the delicate balance between biosecurity and preserving citizens’ fundamental rights.

We obtained a copy of the bill for you here [PDF].

The proposed legislation comes in response to the piecemeal approach taken towards biometric identification in America. Historically, disjointed programs have been created by different states and separate agency undertakings, giving rise to the necessity for a more coherent national strategy. The Post Office Services for Trustworthy Identity Act could mark a landmark shift, focusing on service provision rather than overarching digital ID strategy.

  • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I think it would be better to do everything with accounts that are not necessarily permanently connected to a person’s identity. Any government mediated, definitive system for identifying people is way too risky from a general privacy and freedom perspective.

    • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal. Making a better ID system just removes the identity theft issue.

      The other nice thing would be you could use the id number instead of your name so you can stop giving your PII out to every business. Just “here’s my ID number, bill my insurance, you don’t need anything else.”

      • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        The government can already identify you, and your identity is easy to steal.

        Fixing both of these problems would be better than just one.

          • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            The issue is that the surveillance state is actively bad, and expanding it and making it more official is a much bigger problem than the problem of ill-conceived verification systems, which could be better solved other ways. I don’t want things to be perfect, I want to prioritize moving away from a dystopian panopticon.