• @wahmingM
    link
    English
    79 months ago

    Good thing fusion wouldn’t cause any of that, then

      • @wahmingM
        link
        English
        49 months ago

        Here’s the most basic info on fusion safety I could find: https://www.iaea.org/bulletin/safety-in-fusion

        The conditions required to start and maintain a fusion reaction make a fission-type accident or nuclear meltdown based on a chain reaction impossible. Nuclear fusion power plants will require out-of-this-world conditions — temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius to achieve high enough particle density for the reaction to take place. As fusion reactions can only take place under such extreme conditions, a ‘runaway’ chain reaction is impossible

        “Fusion is a self-limiting process: if you cannot control the reaction, the machine switches itself off,”

        fusion does not produce highly radioactive, long lived nuclear waste.

        • @lurch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -49 months ago

          I didn’t say it could cause “a fission-type accident or nuclear meltdown”.

          It can cause something entirely different: Escaping tritium plasma. For example when the magnetic containment field fails. The plasma will still be hot and radioactive; lighter than air; able to penetrate every component of the reactor.

          It can also slowly leak if not perfectly adjusted.

          • @wahmingM
            link
            English
            69 months ago

            Would you care to share a single reputable source, or are these your own speculations on a technology that all the experts are saying is safe?

          • LughM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            @lurch@sh.itjust.works

            Can you provide a reputable source for these claims? Otherwise I’ll delete the OG comment and its replies. There’s no point in leaving up misinformation.