@ummthatguy@lemmy.world to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish • edit-22 years agoSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up190arrow-down1imageSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.world@ummthatguy@lemmy.world to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish • edit-22 years agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-22 years agoYeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
minus-square@Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoFair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
minus-square@ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years agoField medic with basic training.
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoWell, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.
Yeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
Fair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
Field medic with basic training.
Inflammable means flammable? What a starship.
deleted by creator
Well, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.