@pdxfed@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world • edit-21 year agoEmployees threatened with loss of healthcare if they strike. Their employer is a hospital and they're nurses.www.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1655arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1646arrow-down1external-linkEmployees threatened with loss of healthcare if they strike. Their employer is a hospital and they're nurses.www.oregonlive.com@pdxfed@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world • edit-21 year agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-text
One of the main reasons employers want to keep healthcare private; enormous leverage against labor, organized or not…
minus-square@blackluster117@possumpat.iolinkfedilink35•1 year agoIt might be the irony of the situation more than anything.
minus-square@unfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year agoHospitals want other employers to provide health coverage.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺linkfedilink4•1 year agoThey also dont want a lawsuit because a sick employee couldnt afford healthcare and had no sick days left, so he went to work and infected a dozen vulnerable patients with a disease that turned deadly for them.
minus-square@unfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoHas any court ever reached a judgment based on the premise that healthcare is a right?
minus-square@LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•1 year agoLololololol good luck proving negligence in court over something like that.
It might be the irony of the situation more than anything.
Hospitals want other employers to provide health coverage.
They also dont want a lawsuit because a sick employee couldnt afford healthcare and had no sick days left, so he went to work and infected a dozen vulnerable patients with a disease that turned deadly for them.
Has any court ever reached a judgment based on the premise that healthcare is a right?
Lololololol good luck proving negligence in court over something like that.