cross-posted from: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/726542

I have ~100 users downloaded ~1000 of my files in the last week alone. Music piracy is still alive and kicking. I encourage everyone to download and install SoulseekQT/Nicotine+/Seeker-Android and share whatever kind of music you have for everybody to download. Let’s bring back music piracy!

  • ChuuqoOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    You don’t get high quality mp3s from that.

    • Briongloid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I use deemix for 320kbps, I originally had FLAC but as almost 100% of my listening is remote from my server I found 320 to be great.

      I’m no Hi-Fi listener, but YT rips suck.

        • @ApplePie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Not at all. For a lot of people, hi-fi audio is basically indistinguishable from “regular” audio, and you also need things like a DAC and good headphones to hear it. Bluetooth, as an example, can’t even play hi-fi audio at its full quality.

            • @Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              There is definitely something wrong with your ears if you can’t differentiate between lossless and low quality YouTube rips.

                  • @DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    There are a few key things that you’d notice between high quality and very low quality audio. Mostly, a loss of information, which would result in a muffled audio, a lack of crispy sounds and a loss of general clarity, as well as unpleasant distortion and other made-up noise at worst.

                    For 99.9% of people, it’s not really an mp3 vs wav/aiff comparison, but rather a kbps comparison. High quality mp3 (320kbps) is usually indistinguishable from lossless formats for most people.

                    For a good reasonable idea, compare 128kbps vs 320kbps at the bottom of this page and pay attention to the cymbals and other high-pitched sounds. You should notice that 128kbps sounds a bit more opaque, like it loses a lot of its spark, whereas 320 sounds crisp and clearer.

                    That being said, it’s not a huge difference unless you go below 128, and there’s no point in listening to wav and lossless files if you use Bluetooth, since Bluetooth hard-caps all your rates at 320kbps anyway. But I think it’s fairly noticeable anyway.

      • ChuuqoOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Keeping FLAC is such a hassle, it’s not even worth.