@Masimatutu@lemm.ee to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agotitlefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1513arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1485arrow-down1imagetitlefiles.catbox.moe@Masimatutu@lemm.ee to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml • edit-22 years agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Scrollone@feddit.itlinkfedilink27•2 years agoI think he means it’s not accessible for users with impaired vision
minus-square@library_napperlink20•2 years agoLinks are better than a description. It also allows fact checking. Thank you!
minus-square@baseless_discourse@mander.xyzlinkfedilink3•2 years agoI think both link and image is nice. and people who are too lazy to click can see the content in a reasonable form, people who want to fact check can follow th link.
minus-square@library_napperlink4•2 years agoYes. What shouldn’t be allowed is an image of a tweet/toot without a link to the source content
minus-square@Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink5•2 years agoBetter to add the text to the description
minus-square@EthicalAI@beehaw.orglinkfedilink2•edit-22 years agoTbh it’s just silly. Like, why would you? Share as link exists.
minus-square@TimewornTraveler@lemm.eelinkfedilink5•2 years agoI wouldn’t click a link tbh, pics of text is fine. If its credit add a link, if it’s impairment add a desc, but this post is fine as is
deleted by creator
I think he means it’s not accessible for users with impaired vision
deleted by creator
Links are better than a description. It also allows fact checking. Thank you!
I think both link and image is nice. and people who are too lazy to click can see the content in a reasonable form, people who want to fact check can follow th link.
Yes. What shouldn’t be allowed is an image of a tweet/toot without a link to the source content
Better to add the text to the description
Tbh it’s just silly. Like, why would you? Share as link exists.
I wouldn’t click a link tbh, pics of text is fine. If its credit add a link, if it’s impairment add a desc, but this post is fine as is