• RamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1122 years ago

    It’s been hard trying to ram into liberals’ thick skulls that the “lesser evil” voting shtick that comes every four goddamn years doesn’t quite energize people to haul their asses to the booths, especially when said lesser evil is the incumbent. But I’ve seen some come around recently, so it’s something.

    • Rom [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      982 years ago

      Also doesn’t help when the “lesser evil” policy continues to become increasingly indistinguishable from the “greater evil” policy.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        732 years ago

        We have reached peak evil. There’s no crime that is actually worse than genocide. Libs have lesser-eviled themselves to the bottom of the pit and arrived at the ultimate evil. technically they’ve been there for a long time, but the rank and file had no idea. Now they know what’s going on, it’s in the news, it’s on their social media.

      • Ildsaye [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Look, you’re just going to have to hold your nose and vote Genocidal Fascist Party. You don’t want Fascist-Genocidalist Party to win, do you?

      • @OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        372 years ago

        Also, Donald Trump is an evil fascist, but he’s a cheap evil fascist. He would definitely inflame tensions with rhetorical support for Israel, say “Jerusalem is definitely seriously the capital guys”, and probably appoint his son in law as their diplomat.

        …but he probably wouldn’t send them free weapons. There are a lot of areas where he is the greater evil but I don’t actually think this is one of them.

        • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          422 years ago

          The libs would actually pretend to care about Palestinians and pretend to side against Israel if Trump were president.

          • @Zevlen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Lib here. I care about Palestine and I also feel strongly that Israel shouldn’t even have been established or founded in the first place. Here’s why; state of Israel from the get-go grabbed land, was hostile and violent against Palestinians… When state of Israel was getting established they bombed in cities and villages and terrorized the population… Then they massacred a village. That’s how Israel formed. There was 10% Jewish and the rest 90% were Palestinians and Arabs (Christians and Muslims).

            Probably if You ask enough liberals you’d find out that most don’t agree with the history of Israel and it’s fucked up ways against humanity.

            Also Britain for the most part was responsible for all of this Palestinian/ Israeli mess to begin with. Then everyone else (other western countries) got involved.

                • @Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  352 years ago

                  So you think Israel should never have been founded, and think they’re massacring villages, but simultaneously say Palestine should just sit there and keep “peacefully protesting” because the Great Moral Westerner™ said resisting oppression is bad?

                  How does that make any sense?

                • Amerikan Pharaoh
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  After watching the way liberal scum reacts to Hamas, I’m convinced Black folk should’ve been had a Hamas analogue. Grandmaster Jay didn’t go far enough.

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    52 years ago

                    I know it’s a bit strained, but in terms of “faction of organized armed resistance” wouldn’t either the Panthers or whatever Malcolm X was involved with in terms of community defense count as “a Hamas”?

            • Amerikan Pharaoh
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Probably if You ask enough liberals you’d find out that most don’t agree with the history of Israel and it’s fucked up ways against humanity.

              Then where’s that energy irl? I haven’t met a single lib who ISN’T full-throatedly ‘genocide the Palestinians if they won’t stop resisting’. It’s easy enough to claim you and yours are against it; but your assertion categorically doesn’t match reality.

              • @toomanyjoints69@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                52 years ago

                Ive only seen conservative chuds at the coal mine support palestine. All the democrats in the coal mine want to nuke gaza, and use those words.

                There is an intense enghusiasm among some communities for a big war, regardless of what it is.

                • @ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  thats because a lot of fringe conservatives are also dissillissiouned with liberalism tbh, ive noticed the same thing with working class, right wing liberals; they are much easier to talk too as they are themselves on the fringes of liberal society and usually are only holding the ‘right’ position due to alienation and as a reaction to the perceived status quo.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              122 years ago

              Lib here

              Might I persuade you to reconsider this part? Liberalism/neoliberalism is what produced and maintained Israel, along with many other genocidal projects across the world, even if the liberals in your community shake their heads and then vote blue anyway.

        • Rom [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          I’m sure Israel wouldn’t have had much trouble bribing him to do it.

            • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              172 years ago

              the primary difference is that he actually doesn’t do as much fascist shit as they want him to

              he didn’t for example start any wars despite fascist doctrine clearly advocating for progress funded through the spoils of war

              • @Justice@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                112 years ago

                This is true, although it could be argued he did attempt to start one by killing the Iranian general in Iraq.

                He does seem to understand at some level that Americans (actual people not the lizard-people in the big buildings in DC) don’t want war. And that if he wants to do a war he has to have an extremely strong “reason” to get the bloodlust flowing. Another 9/11 type thing.

                I’m not so sure that would totally even work now days though. I think that’s part of the frustration from the Hillary Clinton types and John Boltons (same person?) is they can’t just racistly say “hate China!” They gotta do a decade of racist bullshiting and lies to prime the hogs and then maybe… I’m still not sure it’s working though.

                People are racist, they don’t like other cultures due to propaganda and lack of exposure, etc., but a war where THEY have to do something is totally different and few, very few, are ever going to volunteer or even let themselves be conscripted for some war in Iran or proxy with China, etc., imo.

                Everyone now saw the Iraq and Afghanistan wars that, even from the US perspective, was a complete shitfest for normal people. Of course they don’t care much about the lives in those countries, so that’s why I say from the American perspective.

                In any case, I do believe Trump “gets” a lot of this and he does value being loved more than anything. If that fucker went into office and signed some significant concessions with China, Iran, Russia, etc. that dialed back tensions by reducing American military presence everywhere he’d be hated by the lizards but probably loved by a lot of Americans.

                The president can do a lot of shit just unilaterally, it’s just a question of willpower. I dunno. Even if he restarted normalization with the DPRK and actually ended the stalled Korean War, I mean, I’d give him a lot of credit for that alone.

                I wish he’d also remove the Cuban embargo but he’s got some gusano in his ear on that one telling him no.

                It’s crazy the good a president can do at any given moment and yet they all choose to do… nothing. Or the bad thing. It’s bleak.

                • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  62 years ago

                  no it’s simpler than that Trump is too selfish to want a war. He simply doesn’t care enough about other countries to want to kill them

      • RamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 years ago

        Most don’t, but a good portion do. Many of us in the West were once disillusioned libs, even. It’s absolutely necessary to further the disillusionment many have with the Dems, if not to turn them over to socialism then to weaken the duopoly and gain strength from the increasing illegitimacy of the system.

    • Egon [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It also doesn’t work when “the lesser evil” spiel has been used for 40-odd years

      • Adkml [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Yea at some point you can’t use the same person with the outchx of “vote for him.and he’ll be more progressive” after people have watched that not happen 6 times with their own eyes.

        So to counteract that liberals wrote an op Ed telling that person they’re wrong and stupid.