minnix to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@penquin@lemm.eelinkfedilink9•2 years agoCan’t bad actors just create their own messaging app and their own encryption methods?
minus-squareumami_wasabilinkfedilink8•2 years agoThey absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 years agoSome of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
minus-square@Deckweiss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 years agohttps://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
Can’t bad actors just create their own messaging app and their own encryption methods?
They absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
Ok then, what are these politicians smoking?
That’s the point
Some of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content
This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
deleted by creator