• @lugal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Limitless as in time, not quantity.

      What does that even mean? Time is on the x-axis, what is on the y-axis if not quantity?

      Your entire premise is false because you’re illiterate.

      Sorry for reading the wrong books apparently…

    • Ook the Librarian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Do you know any useful biological models that are limitless and not exponential? You seem to think that “life is based on” them?

      Also the exponential discussion is a red-herring. You just picked out a detail that was misstated, and pretend to win.

      Now seriously, have you ever heard anyone claim life is based on unlimited growth (outside of this meme)?

        • @lugal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          until the resources or something else intervenes

          Sounds like a limit to me. The entire point is that economic models often don’t take this kind of limits into account. Source: read a book

          • @LemmysMum@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Sounds like a limit to me. The entire point is that economic models often don’t take this kind of limits into account.

            You need to re-read the meme. You’re so close but you can’t see the forest for the trees.

            • @lugal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              The meme makes fun of a post that compares capitalism to cancer by saying “all life is about limitless growth, not just cancer”. This is wrong. Life “knows” its limits. Capitalism doesn’t, neither does cancer

              • @Dimpships@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The only limit to life is the available resources, same with cancer, same with capitalism.

                Life will continue until it ends or consumes the universe, just like cancer does with a human body, or a capitalist does to a society.

                • @lugal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Life reaches a balance. Most parasites don’t kill their host and even if they do, they won’t kill the whole population which would kill the parasite itself. Cancer does exactly that. It kills just one individual but can’t spread to others so it destroys its whole basis of being (since it’s not a parasite).

                  Capitalism is on its way to do exactly that. It spreads over the world, exploiting resources beyond repair and just moves on. It expects exponential growth for some reason and that isn’t sustainable. Life doesn’t do that.

                  You can disagree but don’t call me illiterate. I’m trying to keep calm and civil but if you don’t understand my points, maybe you are stupid, not me.

                  • @Dimpships@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Life reaches a balance.

                    I made a graphic in paint because I didn’t have any crayons for you.

                    Feel free to replace Total Universal Resources, for “Human health” when dealing with cancer. Works as is for capitalism. as it does for life. As per the point of the OP.

              • @LemmysMum@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So what limit does life know about time? Or will it continue for eternity?

                Also might want to look up that latin phrase, I didn’t put it there because it sounded like a fancy spell, it’s a legitimate train of philosophical thought that you obviously have no comprehension of.

                • @lugal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You know the difference between existing and growing, do you? You can continue to exist for eternity without growing. A stone doesn’t grow, neither does a forest necessarily even though the trees do until they die. So each tree grows but not for eternity, and the forest doesn’t grow but exists (potentially) for eternity. Capitalism would want the tree to grow eternity.

                  This is a simplification, so is the original post. You can disagree with it and with me, but don’t call me illiterate. I try to keep calm and civil but if you don’t understand my points, maybe you are stupid not me.

                  • @LemmysMum@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You can continue to exist for eternity without growing.

                    Object can, life can’t. Life is the subject matter.

                    A stone doesn’t grow, neither does a forest necessarily even though the trees do until they die. So each tree grows but not for eternity, and the forest doesn’t grow but exists (potentially) for eternity.

                    Yes.

                    Capitalism would want the tree to grow eternity.

                    No. Capitalism wants to grow from the limited resources of the tree for eternity.

                    Just like cancer wants to grow from the limited resources in your body for eternity.

                    Just like life wants to grow from the universes limited resources until eternity.

                    All inevitably unsustainable.