db0M to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agoOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comexternal-linkmessage-square207fedilinkarrow-up1779arrow-down133cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1746arrow-down1external-linkOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comdb0M to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square207fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@lud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish-1•1 year agoAds have existed for an extremely long time. And most news has cost money since forever. Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoTV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoBecause you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
minus-square@lud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoI mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it. Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
minus-square@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIt is in this context, and you’re categorically wrong on all counts.
Ads have existed for an extremely long time.
And most news has cost money since forever.
Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
TV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
Again, that was not my point.
Not sure why you keep stating it.
Why are you so stuck on the tv thing?
Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
I mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it.
Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
It is in this context, and you’re categorically wrong on all counts.
Again completely ignoring the point…