Harry Potter horseshit aside, the game itself just looks like a generic game, I’d have mistaken it for a Ubisoft game if it wasn’t for the franchise itself.
Yeah everything I’ve seen of it just looks aggressively mid. I don’t see why you’d be interested in it unless you were a Harry Potter fanatic, because on a gameplay level it just looks like a very paint-by-numbers open world game.
Harry Potter horseshit aside, the game itself just looks like a generic game, I’d have mistaken it for a Ubisoft game if it wasn’t for the franchise itself.
Yeah everything I’ve seen of it just looks aggressively mid. I don’t see why you’d be interested in it unless you were a Harry Potter fanatic, because on a gameplay level it just looks like a very paint-by-numbers open world game.
Exactly and I honestly think that’s worse than a bad game
A bad game can be interesting but a bland game is by definition not interesting
I’m being completely serious when I say I would rather play Gollum than this
Every open world game is a shitty Ubisoft clone game and they all suck
LoL. That describes spiderman perfectly to me too, but I figure I’ll see it on a alot of goty lists.
to be fair, swinging around is very fun
turns out “going to an objective marker on your map over and over” is incredibly fun when the “going to an objective marker” is fun by default
in a lot of open world games, that part is not very fun (empty maps, movement that is just holding forward for a while)
in spider-man, you swing and thats fun