• @Whoresradish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    The right will often purposefully misrepresent whatever the left uses as a slogan. So only so much can be done there. As for the use of racial pride, I find that often those who can claim no accomplishments in themselves will often claim pride by association. They could claim pride in race, but really any group. This could be considered a defense mechanism for their own ego as they are not okay accepting their own short comings.

    • @Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Deliberate misrepresentation can only be employed if one understands the original intent.

      If a malicious person wants to try to convince others “Black Lives Matter” means “only black lives matter”, they may have a pretty clear shot (assuming they’re trying to convince someone Right of Centre).

      If it was rebranded to “Black Lives Matter Too”, then they would have a harder time trying to be deceitful.

      I’m convinced there are more people in the camp of failing to read between the lines.

      In either case, language games are important; playing poorly will lead to catastrophic outcomes. The worst part is this is so easy to correct for - a little bit of imagination will illustrate predictable backlash, or lack thereof.

      • @Whoresradish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Fair enough. My conservative family is on the side of purposefully misunderstanding, but I can understand that some may just misunderstand and we should mitigate that when we can.

        • @Zozano@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          God damn, I don’t envy you.

          Having a family which is consciously malicious must make for some very frustrating conversations.

          I, on the other hand, have a right-of-centre family who are mostly just too dull to extrapolate, and spend too much time on FB.

          At least in my case I can sometimes dispel misconceptions.