• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    -131 year ago

    (copied from other comment)

    That’s atrocious. In your own property, no one else is going to collect it. That’s different from maing huge pipes and drainage systems over the city, just collecting what would otherwise be on your driveway or patio.

    • @bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      It’s one of those things that sounds dumb at first glance, but actually has a lot of sound reasoning behind it, read up on it more if you’re interested

        • @sulgoth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          People take it to the logical extreme by converting large tracts in water catching systems. Not an issue if a few do it but it usually isn’t just a few. It starts depleting aquifers and rivers, causing damage to the ecosystem and communities down the way. Doesn’t even need to be water scarce areas either.

          • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Okay so let’s say a million acres get turned into above ground kiddie pools. These people collect and store as much water as they can, so it’s like a million acres times day ten feet deep.

            How much of an effect is that water going to have on the surrounding hydrology, being trapped on those properties?

            • @skyspydude1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              Well, it would amount to about 224 days of average flow of the Colorado River in a given year. So that would probably affect things quite a bit.

              • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Okay, so how close is the actual amount being collected, to a million acres times ten feet deep?

                Do you think it’s ten percent of that? Is everyone with an acre keeping the equivalent of a foot of water on their property?

        • BaroqueInMind
          link
          fedilink
          -12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not sanitary, depletes water tables under the earth that naturally filter water as it sinks through the soil, and is not efficient for collection if servicing a large population.

          OP is simply spreading pro Hamas propaganda

          • Annoyed_🦀 A
            link
            121 year ago

            How is concern about basic human right a pro-hamas propaganda now?

            • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              81 year ago

              According to the Anything Goes Act of 2022, you are allowed to say whatever horseshit you want and it is a legit argument.

              Candy bars? Nuclear death sticks from planet Zorb

              Want fries with that? You’re an antisemite. That’ll be $5.87

              Collecting rainwater? You’re a Hamas agent and everybody knows it

            • BaroqueInMind
              link
              fedilink
              -8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Who knows? Maybe someone should ask the Israeli government instead of assuming without facts.

              If you ask me, I think it’s to control where people can drink safe quality water so they can spend less money on humanitarian aid curing easily preventable stagnating water-bourne diseases and shift that same money over to war production against Hamas instead.

              I think Hamas wants Israel to stretch its defense budget as thin as possible by deliberately creating humanitarian disasters in Gaza so that Israel can’t spend it on military equipment against Hamas.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hamas is only in Gaza. This is a West Bank thing where the Israeli government imposing it’s own civil laws is a war crime.

                • BaroqueInMind
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -51 year ago

                  Forgive the ignorance, I know nothing of the West Bank. Please elaborate.

                  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    41 year ago

                    The West Bank is nominally run by the Palestinian Authority. However it is occupied by the Israeli Army and Israeli settlers are using colonial age tactics to push out the Palestinians with the backing of the Army. One of those tactics is to claim an area that includes a water source and dam it.

              • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                I mean, you’re right that there is an organization terrorizing West Bank. They are also terrorizing Gaza. And a lot of what they are doing serves as pro-Hamas propaganda.