@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down111cross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1407arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-square@interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilink2•2 years agoNot having kids affects how rich you are ?
minus-squareDizzy Devil DuckylinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Not having kids affects how rich you are ?
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
So kids have négative value?
Depending on who you ask, yes.