Apple isn’t happy about India’s demand to upgrade older iPhones with USB-C::Apple has urged the Indian IT ministry to make changes to its single charger rules, as adding USB-C to older iPhone models will make it hard for Apple to meet production targets for India’s manufacturing and export laws.

  • @4L3moNemo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In this case, I would say – fck Apple. Indians demand is solid. Apples shitty policy of random plugs and industry incompatible chargers shouldn’t have been born ever and definetly it shouldn’t continue. Usually I’m against regulation by goverment, but in this case it is realy for the benefit of users and enviroment.

    • @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      861 year ago

      It’s also not like this snuck up on them. Governments around the world warned them very clearly that they had to get onto a standard. Apple dragged their feet the entire time, fighting it at every opportunity, until it went into law.

      I don’t know what India’s law says, but I suspect it boils down to “All phones sold as new after XXXX date must have a USB-C charger”. Apple has the choice to modify the older/cheaper designs, or to stop selling them in that market.

    • @Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 year ago

      I’m not sure why you’re generally against governmental regulation, typical regulations are written in blood.

      I would argue the government seldom goes far enough

      • @TheHotze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        It depends on the regulation. Take zoning for example, you definitely don’t want a bunch of kids or elderly people living next to dangerous factories, but the laws usually go too far and prevent corner stores in residential areas, or demand way too much parking. Regulation can be good or bad.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          The big problem with zoning laws is it’s far too difficult to get the zoning redefined.

          There’s a plot of land near me that’s on a high speed road, It is an old residential plot but because of the road no one wants to live there. In the past when the houses were originally built it was a quiet road, but it’s been upgraded over the years.

          It’ll be an excellent place for a small shop, and indeed a local shop in that area is desperately required, but because it’s zoned as residential they can’t build a shop there. No residential property is ever going to be built there, it’s been abandoned for 20 years, if one was going to be built it would have been built by now.

      • FilthyHands
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        Ever wonder why there’s no more reasonable sized pick up trucks in America? CAFE regulations incentivize auto makers to manufacture ginormous trucks. I am pro-regulation in most cases but there are some real stinkers out there.

      • LazaroFilm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        My mind goes to net neutrality laws debacle for instance. Yes regulation is important to keep companies in check but they can be abused when applied against the consumer.

          • TheRealKuni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            but then started reading up on all the downsides and it’d end like all gov’t regulation does, de-facto government created lock in.

            So you read some propaganda and don’t actually know what net neutrality is. Cool story?

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        And then it goes too far on other things, like the Kind Online Safety Act, while not doing basic things to make the lives of their citizens much better, like UBI, or more controls of companies to stop monopolistic behaviour. Basically: more regulation of companies, less regulation of individuals. Although some things still need to be regulated of course for individuals, like enforcement of software licenses.

    • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      The answer will be that Apple won’t sell iPhones without USB-C in India at all. Have fun waiting for like, 3 years to buy a relatively inexpensive iOS device.

      • @sir_reginald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        There’s enough supply of inexpensive Android phones that support standard chargers. It’s not a problem for consumers if they can’t buy older models of iPhones, there are tons of other smartphones.

        It definitely hurts Apple to loose out in a market as big as India’s. But that’s their fault. They had enough time.

        • @sfgifz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s a fad in India that having an iPhone makes you a sophisticated person.

          I have colleagues who’ve spent more than a whole month’s salary over it. They all use WhatsApp instead of Apple Messages, put on a ₹100 cover they got by bargaining at the railway station they commute to everyday for 2 hours, can’t afford the wireless charger, and every 3rd person seems to have one - idk what’s sophisticated about such an unexclusive device ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • @Mamertine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        If this were a small country, yes that is what would happen. In the second most populous country, I suspect that’s too huge of a market to just accept as a loss.

        Once a customer leaves the apple ecosystem they’re unlikely to return to it. So they would lose those customers forever.

        • @emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Unfortunately, Apple’s marketshare in India is tiny, so they can leave without too much loss.

          Also, India is now the world’s most populous country. :-(

          • @GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            That also means that there’s still a huge potential for growth, before competitors reel in their potential customers. If they let other manufacturers divide the market among themselves, it may be harder to gain market share later.

      • @Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        For a market as big as India, with it’s up and coming middle class, Mr. Tim Apple would fuck a pig (with consent) on Live TV if it was what it took to keep selling there.