@return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoCarmakers Push Forward With Plans To Make Basic Features Subscription Services, Despite Widespread Backlashwww.techdirt.commessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down19cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1606arrow-down1external-linkCarmakers Push Forward With Plans To Make Basic Features Subscription Services, Despite Widespread Backlashwww.techdirt.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-square@Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoYou could bypass and put your own hardwired switch in. But it wouldn’t be integrated into the car’s gui. reverse engineering for the purpose of interoperability is protected by the DMCA. “to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201# Modchips makers were sued and jailed. Interoperability didn’t apply because they violated the “no commercial use” part of the title.
minus-square@atrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI never claimed it would be. Car toys will absolutely do what they have always done to get around car makers and provide customers with the modifications they want. That is not even a question.
You could bypass and put your own hardwired switch in. But it wouldn’t be integrated into the car’s gui.
“to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201#
Modchips makers were sued and jailed. Interoperability didn’t apply because they violated the “no commercial use” part of the title.
I never claimed it would be. Car toys will absolutely do what they have always done to get around car makers and provide customers with the modifications they want. That is not even a question.