@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1646arrow-down124
arrow-up1622arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.world@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink4•1 year agoMost languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
minus-square@Feathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoYeah it’s nice to be able to see it
Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Yeah it’s nice to be able to see it