@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 7 months agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1645arrow-down124
arrow-up1621arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.world@jroid8@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 7 months agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink4•7 months agoMost languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
minus-square@Feathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoYeah it’s nice to be able to see it
Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Yeah it’s nice to be able to see it