• @flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The only sane thing to do in response to this is the same thing that SHOULD have been done when Paramount went all sue happy on folks making unofficial Star Trek stuff.

    Creators should stop making things related to their works and consumers should stop consuming and giving Paramount money for the official works.

    The lesson being if the rights holder for something wants to keep it all to themselves, let them, forget it exists and starve it out of profitable existence. Spend the time and money with content, creators, and consumers that don’t believe sucking up ever dime that’s not nailed down is, or should be, the ultimate goal.

    • body_by_make
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2911 months ago

      Did you even read the article? This dumbass wrote a book based on LotR characters and then HE tried to sue the Tolkien estate and Amazon. This person actually probably needs mental help if they think this could have worked, it was such an incredibly bad idea that there has to be some kind of mental health crises involved.

      • Dr. Jenkem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2411 months ago

        Worth also mentioning the Tolkien estate is notoriously letigous. There are piracy sites that specifically ban Tolkiens works from being uploaded for that very reason.

      • @bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1211 months ago

        They plagiarized his fanfiction. Theoretically you would have rights to your stories even if they involve characters that you don’t have rights to.

        • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          US law is on the Estate’s side

          If the characters/events from LOTR are a big part of his fan fiction then the Estate can have it destroyed

          Also since the author had no legal ownership of the works, there is nothing wrong with the people who have rights to it using it

            • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              611 months ago

              The if part is what gets argued in court

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformative_use

              transformation is a type of fair use that builds on a copyrighted work in a different manner or for a different purpose from the original

              Fifty Shades vs Twilight would be transformative

              Anderson v. Stallone

              Would be the most likely case reference for this ruling where Anderson made a Rocky sequel and it was deemed infringement

              • @bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Yeah wow it’s like I thought ( the right holder being able to dick around writers)

                It was strikingly clear to the Court that Anderson’s work was a derivative work; that under 17 U.S.C. section 106(2) derivative works are the exclusive privilege of the copyright holder (Stallone, in this case); and that since Anderson’s work is unauthorized, no part of it can be given protection.

                After he had meetings with MGM about using that script.

    • @bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      That’s a lose lose scenario. I’d rather guillotine the copyright holder so the IP “fall in the public domain” if you ask me.

      • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 months ago

        Can’t have copyright in capitalistic systems

        The person who can produce the work the cheapest is the one who gets money