What comes after open source? Bruce Perens is working on it
www.theregister.com
'Our licenses aren't working anymore,' says free software pioneer

TLDR: Companies should be required to pay developers for any open source software they use.

He imagines a simple yearly compliance process that gets companies all the rights they need to use Post-Open software. And they’d fund developers who would be encouraged to write software that’s usable by the common person, as opposed to technical experts.

It’s an interesting concept, but I don’t really see any feasible means to get this to kick off.

What are your thoughts on it?

  • @asret@lemmy.zip
    5•1 year ago

    The ability to modify the code is a central tenet of free software. The GPL takes care of making those modifications available to others. That effectively is the payment the original devs get.

      • @asret@lemmy.zip
        1•1 year ago

        Again, my freedom to use and modify the code as I see fit - including selling it - is the whole point.

        There’s no doubt the developers deserve support for their work, but there’s no requirement imposed by Free Software for this.

        All criminals get away with their crimes for a time. How many companies want to be sitting on a time bomb like that though?