A US appeals court Saturday paved the way for a California law banning the concealed carry of firearms in “sensitive places” to go into effect January 1, despite a federal judge’s ruling that it is “repugnant to the Second Amendment.”

The law – Senate Bill 2 – had been blocked last week by an injunction from District Judge Cormac Carney, but a three-judge panel filed an order Saturday temporarily blocking that injunction, clearing the path for the law to take effect.

The court issued an administrative stay, meaning the appeals judges did not consider the merits of the case, but delayed the judge’s order to give the court more time to consider the arguments of both sides. “In granting an administrative stay, we do not intend to constrain the merits panel’s consideration of the merits of these appeals in any way,” the judges wrote.

  • @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    -26 months ago

    How fragile and distrusting of other people does someone have to be to feel the urge to carry a gun around on their person at all times? Granted America can be a bit (lol) dystopian but to warrant a gun on your hip to go to Trader Joe’s? That’s some scared person behaviour. For a nation that wants to come across as being the confident cowboy there really is a scared child behind it all.

      • that guy
        link
        fedilink
        06 months ago

        I’ve been advocating for military slap fights for a decade

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      I think there are quite a few scared people carrying guns around in the US, and that’s very unfortunate. In fact, if you’re carrying because you’re afraid, you should reevaluate your situation. It’s just another tool you can carry around, one that you’re very, very unlikely to need.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        In fact, if you’re carrying because you’re afraid, you should reevaluate your situation

        Tell that to my (former) neighbors in Chicago. It was a poor neighborhood. There was gang activity. Most of the people that lived there have been on the same street for 30+ years. They couldn’t afford to move, and cops DNGAF because the neighborhood was 98% black. What’s to “re-evaluate”? You can’t move, cops sure as fuck aren’t going to save your ass when trouble comes calling, and the violence is real. Even without guns, three young gang members in the alley will fuck you up.

        I’ve got five fire extinguishers in my home, but I’ve never had a house fire.

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          Yeah yeah, I hear you, but there’s a difference between rational fear and irrational fear. You know full well I was talking about folks who live in safe neighborhoods. Even then, you should be practiced enough that you’re not walking around paranoid and anxious all the time. It doesn’t do you any good to shoot at noises in the dark.

          • @freeindv
            link
            26 months ago

            There’s a difference between the reality he’s expressing and the made up hateful strawman you’re beating up in your head

            • Liz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -26 months ago

              What? I’m honestly not sure what you think is in my head. I was referring to people who are scared to live life in what is actually a safe area?

      • @ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I think there are quite a few scared people carrying guns around in the US, and that’s very unfortunate.

        See “US Police” for more information.

    • @freeindv
      link
      46 months ago

      What a hateful way to look at it. Self defense is a basic human right and being prepared to do the right thing doesn’t make you “scared”