• @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    They’d have to fuck it up to a truly astonishing degree for it to be anywhere near as bad as a failed execution using the other methods currently in use. Like maybe use chlorine gas instead of nitrogen.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      They just need to not have good seals on the mask so non-nitrogen air leaks in which would give the same symptoms as slow suffocation.

      Note that they keep fucking up to an astonishing degree, so it is likely to happen with any method they try.

      • @shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        would give the same symptoms as slow suffocation

        If you don’t understand the science, please STFU.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          A bad seal means that the co2 is not being removed properly and not being replaced with nitrogen as designed. Plus the person knows they are being killed, which makes the smallest physical symptoms more noticeable since people do notice things they are expecting.

          Being hostile while defending the state that keeps fucking up executions makes you look like an ass.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        No. It would either work more slowly or it wouldn’t work. There would be no pain.

        The feeling of suffocation comes from a buildup of CO2 in the body, not from a lack of oxygen.

        Since regular air is pretty close to 80/20 nitrogen and oxygen, simply removing the oxygen results in a painless, odorless death.

        It’s actually a concern for people using rebreathers. If the CO2 scrubber keeps working but new oxygen isn’t introduced into the system, the diver will go from feeling fine to passing out without ever knowing it.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Air leaks means that the co2 is not going to be efficiently removed, and your example of a diver is actually supporting the point that the seal needs to be really good for it to be effective. Note that the person drifting off in an execution knows they are dying which is different than just drifting off unknowingly. Painless doesn’t mean it isn’t causing stress from the knowledge of imminent death.

          Plus the underlying context of the state fucking up all of their execution methods shows they will fuck this up too. It doesn’t matter how good the method is in theory when they are incompetent.

          • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            You really don’t know what you’re talking about here.

            A poor mask seal won’t cause them to inhale enough of their exhaled CO2 unless they’re also putting a bag over their head, and the level of atmospheric CO2 doesn’t cause the sensation of suffocation, otherwise you’d feel like you were suffocating at all times.

            The death penalty is barbaric, but if you’re going to do it, this is the least-painful method, and one in which botching the execution simply results in nothing happening, as opposed to ther methods where it causes pain and injury.

            Yes, the psychological pain/stress isn’t alleviated by nitrogen. I personally think the biggest improvement they could make (aside from abolising the death penalty) would be to do it without a mask in a hyperbaric chamber where the elevated partial pressure of nitrogen would result in nitrogen narcosis and may relieve some of the stress.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              A poor seal affects air going in and being pulled out, because the outside air can flow past the air next to the mouth and down the exit tube without going through the person’s lungs. Especially if the faulty seal is on the exit tube connections, which is the kind of fuck up that the state is fully capable of doing.

              Without that circulation, they will keep breathing the same air, which will build up CO2.

              The system is complex and you apparently assume it is simple and comparable to a room full of nitrogen. The mask is actually more complex.

              You clearly don’t know what you are talking about.

              • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                I’m not talking out of my ass because I read some random opinions online. Are you a University lecturer that teaches courses on the medical effects of pressurized gasses? I am. Do you have certification granting you authority to service and inspect medical gas systems, regulators, full-face masks, and pressure vessels? I do.

                A blocked exhalation valve and a bad seal are not the same thing. They’re actually the opposite, though a blocked valve can result in a bad seal as the pressure inside the mask inceases. But the escaping high-pressure gas will result in a venturi effect that will pull away the exhaled gasses.

                It’s actually harder to screw it up with a mask versus a room because the small volume of air compared to the necessary rate of flow causes the air to be more turbulent and prevents dead-air spaces. Basically, the incoming nitrogen flushes out the contents of the mask unless the seal is so bad that the nitrogen doesn’t flow in the mask at all, in which case the CO2 escapes into the room through the same shitty seals that don’t contain the Nitrogen.

                The biggest risk is someone simply forgetting to turn the valve to let in the nitrogen, though that’s dead-simple to prevent with a 1-way gasket that allows outside air in if the pressure in the mask drops below outside pressure (when the victim inhales). Though in that particular case it is important that the CO2 not be allowed to form a dead zone, which is done by having more 1-way gaskets in front of the mouth and nose that doesn’t allow exhaled gasses back.

                You know - the same high-tech shit they use in the base of $12 snorkels that work for decades in salt water.

                • snooggums
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  First, I doubt your claimed credentials because you are an anonymous person on the internet.

                  Second, the actual process they are using was provided in a highly reacted version that experts have pointed out makes the process unclear. The only reason to hide this information is to obscure the fact that it was poorly designed.

                  Third, the state is unlikely to have someone who is qualified to design and implement this process correctly because people who work with medical systems are unlikely to be involved with the death penalty, and this is not the same thing as a snorkel or they would be using that.

                  All that said, you keep acting like it is simple while dancing around the fact that they keep fucking up simple things when executing people. Who cares how easy it is to make chocolate milk when the person who is making it still fucks it up?

                  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    You really don’t seem to understand how little is required to make it work.

                    This snorkel mask and a hose to a nitrogen canister would be incredibly effective.

                    I’m not even joking. They made a 3D-printable adapter to the mask for attaching N99 filters. It’s safe because it isolates incoming and outgoing air, which would make it work great.

                    And that’s a hundred mask. The final design would obviously have more going on. For a couple hundred you can have one with an on-demand regulator operating just fine.

                    Or just use a SCBA (firefighting) mask hooked up to a nitrogen tank.