Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

  • @wahming
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    It is, this is the equivalent of protesting the printing press. It would be most useful to find a way to transition gracefully, but most people are still in the denial stage.

    • @MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The printing press didn’t change the text inside the books and made books widely available to the public. Art is already everywhere, we don’t need AI to have enough of it and it fundamentally replaces what is actually good about art.

      • @wahming
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        AI is making it possible for everybody to create art (for certain definitions of art). That’s the same thing the printing press made possible, it lowered the barriers to anybody creating their own publication. The parallels are extremely numerous and striking, for those without a preexisting bias.

        • @MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Prompting a machine isn’t creating art any more than commissioning an artist is creating art. Writers still had to actually write books to print, AI removes everything between the initial idea and the final product.

          • @wahming
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            There’s a thousand Benedictine monks who said the same thing at the thought of an unadorned, unillustrated stack of paper stapled together.

            • @MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              You’d have a point if the printing presses only put out randomized, meaningless chicken scratch, but instead you’re conflating how art is presented with the art itself.