• @SexyTimeSasquatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        396 months ago

        The world court can do two things. First, arbitrate between two consenting states who agree to abide by the decision. Second, issue advisory rulings which have absolutely no functional authority. America doesn’t have to step in. Nation states around the world wouldn’t have signed onto a world court that could actually compel them to obey, we all like our sovereignty.

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          106 months ago

          Which is ironic because as citizens of these countries we don’t get that choice regarding the laws we’re compelled to obey.

          • @xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            13
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            America likes Israel the way it is. I honestly don’t know why any more, but America will not step in because America doesn’t want to step in. Biden’s popularity is in freefall because he refuses to do anything about America’s complicity in this genocide–yet, he still does nothing. There must be a reason that overrides the compelling case to end a genocide, but I don’t know what it is. He doesn’t even have to send troops, he just has to stop sending them aid. He won’t even do that. Idgi, but the fact stands that America will not step in.

            • @shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              86 months ago

              Here’s the “why”:

              "Israel is the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk, does not carry even one American soldier, and is located in a critical region for American national security. "

              ~Alexander Haig

            • @fenynro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              66 months ago

              It’s because behind both parties is a unified force known as the military industrial complex, which loves any excuse to make and sell weapons.

              Say our government decides to send 100 million dollars in military aid to another country. Most, if not all, of that 100 million is sent as physical armaments rather than actual currency. The government gives companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, etc the actual money for this aid effort, and their products (weapons of war) are what is sent along as aid.

              As it turns out, companies like the aforementioned love any excuse to sell more weapons, and carry large amounts of sway with politicians on both sides of the aisle, so they pressure those sales to continue.

              • @VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                66 months ago

                That, and there’s groups like AIPAC that’ll do their best to crush any politician who’s not sufficiently deferential to the apartheid regime.

                Incidentally, Biden once bragged about going to more AIPAC events than any other politician in Washington.

              • IninewCrow
                link
                fedilink
                English
                46 months ago

                I’m rewatching Oliver Stone’s JFK from 1991 … and when you listen to Costner’s monologue from the real life Jim Garrison explaining the motivation of why JFK was assassinated and eliminated, the Military Industrial Complex was at the top of the list.

                Just the actions of what happened the day after the assassination speaks volumes … the new president Lyndon Johnson stepped back JFK’s original plans to withdraw from Vietnam and made promises to his military that they would continue the war.

                They didn’t just kill a president in 1963, they signed the death warrant for two hundred thousand American soldiers and a million Vietnamese.

                • @MaXimus421@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  As a companion piece to that great film witch doesn’t even scratch the surface of the tragedy in 1963, I urge you to read or listen to the the book “LBJ - Mastermind of the JFK Assassination” by Phillip F Nelson.

                  It’s absolutely fascinating and brings up more than a few irrefutable points. Seriously, give it a read or listen. (I personally prefer the audiobook).

                  It’s 27 hrs long…

              • @xantoxis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                any excuse

                Not quite any excuse though. The world is full of conflicts, we still get a choice about which ones we’re involved in, and on which side. If the M-I complex wants to build weapons, build them for Ukraine and nobody in the west will object. Build them to stop genocides, of which we still have multiple options. We love to build and sell weapons, yes, but we also usually make an effort to provide a moral veneer over it. Israel’s moral veneer has long vanished, and yet we still choose to be on that side of the conflict. That is what I don’t understand.

            • bedrooms
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The only hypothesis I have is that Israeli money is funneled to election funds. Like, if Dems anger zionists, Republicans will win the election. I don’t know if that’s true but I haven’t found any other explanation yet.

              • @VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                106 months ago

                That’s basically what AIPAC and similar groups do, though they blackmail during primaries as well as general elections.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              -56 months ago

              Oh no, you misunderstood.

              I’m saying America will step in to protect Israel from facing any kinds of consequences. It’s like he said, if Israel didn’t exist we’d have to create it.

      • @jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        I think the US is about done with Netanyahu. The media is already starting to talk about the fractures between him and Biden.

          • @BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            Biden isn’t going to do a damn thing to fundamentally alter our Israel policy. He’s been hawkish on Palestine for decades, and despite how much the youth vote disapproves of the war, there’s also a substantial part of the base as well as independents who strongly support Israel.

            There have been several opinion polls recently showing that a majority of Americans support Israel over Palestine, even as Israel has killed 20x as many people as Hamas.

            Biden is in zugzwang. Keep supporting Israel’s slaughter, and the youth vote will stay home. Oppose it, and he’ll be labeled a Hamas sympathizer or an anti-Semite. Continue to do nothing, and he looks weak and ineffective. Every move is the wrong move.

        • Annoyed_🦀 🏅A
          link
          16 months ago

          Exactly. It’s incredibly hard to make genocide charge stick, especially when Hamas do built tunnel under the city and Netanyahu is hiding behind Hamas while doing whatever he want with Gaza, he know it takes years for the judgement and appeal, by the time the final judgement came out Netanyahu would’ve already done serving his term and they would’ve already shape Palestine to whatever they wanted. The court literally can’t stop him.

          • The Snark Urge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            You’re right. My only hope is for the soft power of a legal finding to have some unknown knock-on effects down the road. The whole situation is like a puzzle with only bad solutions… like the box from hellraiser but literally worse.