For the past few years, a growing number of users, analysts, and experts raised alarms about a truth that feels obvious to a lot of people who surf around in web browsers: the quality of Google results is in serious decline. Google disagrees.

  • hannes3120
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    Or they still think they are entitled to a “free” search engine and don’t see the amount of resources needed for that and that it’s actually a service worth paying for, either through a subscription or through a donation-based service.

    Switching one private company for another is definitely not the way to go…

    • Pigeon
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Or they’re working class or buried in medical bills and can’t afford to be spending money on things like search engines that have a free alternative, even if it is worse.

      I’m not actually convinced the alternatives are any better here, anyway.

    • moon_matter
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Careful about how you throw around the word “entitlement”. The top competition is free and search engines are very low value for the average person. It’s very reasonable to expect search engines to be free and for anything paid to be a niche product. Google search results may be terrible, but not so terrible that I’m going to pay $5/month to escape it.

    • @petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Subscription services still get worse. The arrogance Cable TV must have to show us ads—cable was the ad-free service back in its day. The same is happening with Netflix. The same will happen with Spotify. This thing is a snake eating it’s own fucking tail.

      I want something without perverse incentives. Donations, maybe. Taxes, possibly. I get free roads, why not a free search index.