• @GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    Granted it isn’t the US, so our customs and laws don’t apply. That being said, it really depends on how they got the evidence I think.

    If it was a public post(intentionally or accidentally public), or someone reported it, or snapchat’s TOS authorizes scanning and reporting “private” messages, then yeah, seems like this teenager’s actions should have consequences.

    If it’s a result of an illegal police state that has access to people’s private communications, the evidence should be fully inadmissible. And the response is a result of information that should not have been in their hands to begin with, making this 100% on them.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      I think the former is a lot more likely. But the article is too short on details.

      • @GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        I truly hope that’s the case, though I think we’re all a little more accustomed to seeing police state overstepping in this day in age. And the article is meant to be ragebait for that anyway I think.

        I’d say wait for the details to surface, and if it truly ends up being police state overstep, I hope their citizens hold them accountable in whatever way will bring about change. I like the French methods personally.