• @Mo5560@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    110 months ago

    Sorry for awkward sentences

    Don’t be sorry, you’re communicating quite clearly.

    And, just for the record, I do agree that the term “organic” is daft when referring to food. The term is entirely arbitrary and I wish we had a food certificate that was actually based on scientific factors (like impact on environment etc.)…

    They need to have orbital hybridization

    This one is often cited as a factor (because it excludes carbides like e.g. WC, TiC, TaC) but afaik it’s not true. Carbon in graphite is sp2 hybridised, in diamond it’s sp3 hybridised, both are explicitly excluded from the definition of organic.

    Side note: I am unsure whether graphene falls under the definition of organic. Depending on how you look at it, it’s just a huge aromatic molecule. Don’t get me started on nanoribbons which are synthesized from organic precursors…
    But I know people doing research on graphene, and I don’t think they would care about that definition. It simply doesn’t matter.

    Side note^2: While CO_2 is also explicitly excluded from being organic, it can be used as an educt in organic reactions (e.g. Preparing Phenylacetic Acid from Benzyl chloride and CO_2)

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Carbon in graphite is sp2 hybridised, in diamond it’s sp3 hybridised

      Didn’t expect this.