@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square360fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down130cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1988arrow-down1external-linkJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.com@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square360fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink-8•2 years agothat market cap is a dumb metric to use to dictate protocol specifications
minus-squareEager EaglelinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-22 years agowtf are you even talking about? What protocol specs? Who’s dictating what?
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink-6•2 years agothe specifications of the bitcoin protocol require proof of work. using the market cap to dictate what the protocol specification should be is absurd.
minus-squareEager EaglelinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoand who’s proposing that? I picked the top in market cap to illustrate what most relevant coins are doing because most of them are irrelevant shitcoins.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONSlinkfedilink-9•2 years agoseems like you undrestand that market cap is irrelevant to the protocol design.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoWant to suggest a better one?
what’s your point?
that market cap is a dumb metric to use to dictate protocol specifications
wtf are you even talking about? What protocol specs? Who’s dictating what?
the specifications of the bitcoin protocol require proof of work. using the market cap to dictate what the protocol specification should be is absurd.
and who’s proposing that? I picked the top in market cap to illustrate what most relevant coins are doing because most of them are irrelevant shitcoins.
seems like you undrestand that market cap is irrelevant to the protocol design.
Want to suggest a better one?
uh… adoption, stability, code commits, forks…