VATICAN CITY (CNS) – People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual – this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

  • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -14
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Old irrelevant fuck continues to try and rehabilitate a dying organization’s image before the history books can slam shut on its chapter. Tear down the churches and build something useful instead, that’s a lot of wasted space in cities across the world.

    • @chillhelm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2610 months ago

      Don’t actually tear down church buildings though.

      Many of them are beautiful and even if the morals of the Organisation(s) that built them are, to put it mildly, “outdated”, it is still a huge part of our cultural history.

      Use the spaces to open “sexual health centers” (like Planned Parenthood on steroids), libraries, and in like 1 or 2 per continent you could create memorial centers to keep alive the memories of the suffering created by organized, doctrinal religion.

      Moving past a phase of our cultural development has to include remembering that phase. The church buildings turned to useful purpose will be powerful monuments.

      • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Leave the hospitals up, just require that they be transferred to a legitimate healthcare organization which will offer medical care without the condition of “…if my god says it’s okay” attached.

        • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          it’s the “require that they be transferred” part which might be an issue. if there’s a legal pathway to this then lets go!

          • @betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Understandable. Could be a matter of putting an industry restriction in place where in order to own and operate a hospital, they’d be bound to a set of rules that would not give them the authority to refuse things like abortions and other types of healthcare that the bible-thumpers find objectionable. No more incentive to run a hospital when they won’t have that level of control over peoples’ lives.

            • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙
              link
              fedilink
              English
              410 months ago

              Make the hypocratic Oath hypocratic law, binding all medical professionals. clarify that hypocratic law means preventing harm to the person delivering the child, and that the “harm” doesn’t apply to the practictioner’s personal beliefs.

              Univeral healthcare also couldn’t hurt.