• @RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    899 months ago

    1.4Pb (~175TB), the quoted number of movies is based on a 14GB movie which is very small (most BluRay disks hold somewhere between 25 and 50GB) and no discussion about write speed, so basically this is cool research that someone has done and is no closer to a commercial product that any of the dozens of other articles that have come out on this topic in the last 15 years

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      289 months ago

      I rip enough physical media to tell you that post-compression 14GB is not far from average for a 4K movie. I guarantee that Netflix isn’t storing those any bigger than that. Hard drives don’t grow on trees, you know?

      It’s still good to know where the top end of optical storage is, even at an academic level, even if these end up not being widely used or being used for specific applications at smaller capacities. We’ll see where or if they resurface next, but I’m pretty sure we’re not gonna get femtosecond lasers built into our laptops anytime soon.

      • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        Streaming services definitely don’t give you full quality files. They’re compressed to save bandwidth. Netflix only uses about 7GB per hour in 4k. That’s about the exact size of the higher quality 1080p movies I download.

        • @anon987@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s usually less than 7gb per hour, it ranges from 2 to 7GB, it adjusts butrate on the fly. Netflix quality sucks.

          Edit: realized I typed butrate instead of bitrate, it fits, so I’m leaving it.

      • @vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah it’s fine, especially with recent codecs like AV1 and you’d expect future codecs to improve further.

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      These aren’t really trying to target a commercial product, at least not anyway. For now these are of interest to enterprises.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        I could see them being archival backups for TV broadcast, quite a few are still using tapes for long term archive.

    • @evilsmurf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      From the article:

      What’s almost more remarkable is that the scientists say a single new blank disc can be manufactured using conventional DVD mass production techniques within six minutes.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        If this was a response to write speeds they meant the speed at which data can be written to the disc, not the time ot takes to build the disc. Read/Write speeds are a standard measure used to tell whether something would be efficient to use. For example one could say storing an OS on a DVD and booting would be dumb because it would run extremely slow, where as the read speed for playing music or a movie off it wouldn’t be an issue as it doesn’t need higher performance for such.

    • Hucklebee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And I believe 4k blurays are on average around 100 gb? So that will be about 1800-2000 movies. Still a lot, but not the 14.000 they say.

      • @Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        The rips I pirate aren’t re-encoded and are usually in the range of 50-75GB, depending on the length of the film.

        • Hucklebee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Hmm, interesting. I guess on actual Blurays they would have space for extras, menus, sometimes different dubs etc, so that makes sense!