“We need people to understand that these conversations take time.”

  • Yer Ma
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -344 months ago

    Right… 0.1%… So ignore them instead of letting them trigger the whole company

    Making announcements just gives those idiots a voice they would not otherwise have

    • @wahming
      link
      English
      344 months ago

      Spoken like somebody who’s never received a death threat before

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      214 months ago

      That’s like 10 people per dev harrassing the team. It’s a huge number. You can’t really “ignore” them.

    • @papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      Or we could just not normalize sending death threats over the Internet? Don’t really get why there’s an issue with that

    • Konraddo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      There’s always a fine line between acknowledging the threat or ignoring it. In online situations, I do agree that ignoring the threat is the best cause of action because it’s difficult for anybody to take real action.

      If a person gives a death threat on a forum, for example, then ban the account. If you feel that it has real life consequences, then report it to the police when needed. But would you really want to make a post talking about how you feel about the death threat and why you ban the account?

      But then, I believe this is a PR move to show that they care about the employee, and to encourage good customers to show their gratitude to the devs. Perhaps the devs are really on the brink of collapse, mentally, so a little support would be helpful.