It puts a lot of features at the fingertips of the faithful, including the ability to filter whole neighborhoods by religion, ethnicity, “Hispanic country of origin,” “assimilation,” and whether there are children living in the household.

Its core function is to produce neighborhood maps and detailed tables of data about people from non-Anglo-European backgrounds, drawn from commercial sources typically used by marketing and data-harvesting firms.

training videos produced by users show the extent to which evangelical groups are using sophisticated ways to target non-Christian communities, with questionable safeguards around security and privacy.

In one instance, he points to the sharable note-taking function and suggests leaving information for each household, such as “Daughter left for college” and “Mother is in the hospital.”

increasingly popular among Christian supremacist groups, prayerwalking calls on believers to wage “violent prayer” (persistently and aggressively channeling emotions of hatred and anger against Satan), engage in “spiritual mapping” (identifying areas where evil is at work, such as the darkness ruling over an abortion clinic, or the “spirit of greed” ruling over Las Vegas), and conduct prayerwalking (roaming the streets in groups, “praying on-site with insight”).

newly arrived refugees might well find a knock on the door from strangers with knowledge of their personal circumstances distressing—and that’s before these surprise visitors even begin to attempt to convert them.

placing people of different ethnic and religious backgrounds on easy-to-access databases is a dangerous road to go down

    • Xhieron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      184 months ago

      Your quote never appears anywhere in any of those citations.

      That the Bible–a collection of religious texts, many of them advancing directly or indirectly the ethnic and national interests of their authors’ people groups–would have stuff in it about killing people for lots of reasons is no surprise.

      But your purported origin of the common proverb in the Bible is a fabrication. It’s not in there, anywhere.

      Also Christianity doesn’t advocate killing non-believers as a matter of doctrine. Plenty of Christians have done that historically, but it’s not a teaching of the religion, and it’s never advocated in the Bible, anywhere.

      There’s plenty to criticize Christians for. I don’t understand why you felt you needed to make something up.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        What quote?

        The blood/water one?

        You know you get better answers with clear questions, right?

        Otherwise this happens where no on has any idea what you’re talking about and just trying to guess what you mean.

        It’s rarely as productive as just being specific in the first place

        • @Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          Answer the question. You specifically stated “it’s in the bible”. It was obvious to me, reading this thread, what exactly they meant. Please show us the location of the quote.

          • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 months ago

            Why would you see that for a full day no one had clarified what they asked for…

            And then demand I answer it without still saying what you think theyre asking for?

            I don’t know if you’re trolling or honestly dont see the issue, but it really doesn’t matter.

            Because when you act like that tacking on a “please” doesn’t count as being polite.

            • @Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              No, it’s because it is not in the bible and now you are trying to make shit up when called out.

        • @PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          The old acknowledged the question but dance around answering it by throwing out another question and attack of character.

          This guy has talked shit online before, this isn’t his first rodeo