• poVoqOP
    link
    fedilink
    78 months ago

    Did you read the article to the end? The entire point is that these banners are not needed at all, anywhere in the world.

    • kbal
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      That conclusion depends on two things: That the “do not track” header would suffice instead, which I think it doesn’t as things stand; or that all builders of web sites would do better not to make any attempt to (for example) keep track of which of their visitors have been there before, which is not going to happen for reasons that are obvious. If those obvious reasons are found to be inadequate, they should at least be addressed to make the point convincingly.

      Otherwise one might as well go ahead and say that most of what exists on the web today is not needed at all, which is also technically true. It’s strange to see it suggested that it’s wrong to think law makers “should have known” that something like what happened would be the result. It was inevitable from the start, and as I recall much talked-about. The sites that have cookie banners are all trying to sell you something, and the sales department is not going to willingly give up the best tools it’s had since the 1990s when the cost is just looking slightly more sleazy to first-time visitors.

      • poVoqOP
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        or that all builders of web sites would do better not to make any attempt to (for example) keep track of which of their visitors have been there before

        If there is a technical reason to do so, the GDPR explicitly allows doing so without any consent banner… and if there isn’t other than harvesting data to sell it to advertisers, then yes there is no reason to have that.

        • kbal
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          The article seems to confirm what’s been my understanding which is that that pretty much anything beyond “session cookies” or the like is covered, whether or not the data collected gets sold or transferred to anyone else.

          But yes, there are reasons why data gets sold to advertisers as well. Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren’t there.

          • poVoqOP
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren’t there.

            The entire point of the GDPR is to reign in those “commercial incentives” to spy on users for a little extra money from advertisers.

            But I am starting to get the feeling I am trying to argue with someone who makes a living out of spying on users and selling that data to advertisers, which makes this argument moot.

            • kbal
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Nope, I’m not one of them. But I have worked for large companies in the past and therefore have met them.

              The GDPR has done substantial good, not least in just getting people to talk about this sort of thing. But the cookie banners are and always have been ridiculous and a sign of one of its failures. An outright ban on surveillance capitalism business models would suit me better.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      -18 months ago

      Which may be correct, but given that they mangled the argument in that section, we can’t exactly trust the rest.