ruffsl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agoProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.commessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down110
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comruffsl to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoBetter. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilink3•1 year agoA more polished unholy list of depencies?
minus-square@xmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoThe Javascript reference could be read as how every project ends up with an unholy list of npm dependencies - it’s awful to look at but it works. I think the PHP reference was just “idk servers or something?”
Everyone hates on PHP and JavaScript.
JS, at least, deserves it.
How do you feel about TypeScript
U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
Well, what TYPE of turd is it? ;)
any
You better catch that.
Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
A more polished unholy list of depencies?
The Javascript reference could be read as how every project ends up with an unholy list of npm dependencies - it’s awful to look at but it works.
I think the PHP reference was just “idk servers or something?”