• m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1148 months ago

      I’m all in for the return of actual game expansions.

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        StarCraft Brood Wars Diablo 2 Lord of Destruction

        People shit on Bethesda but they’ve consistently released banger expansions. Far Harbor was incredible.

        • @Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          Even the publicly acknowledged start of Micro Transactions “Horse Armour” was couched in decent medium sized DLC and The Shivering Isles

            • @Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              Oblivion had a LOT of post release paid content, most of which was decent value per $ spent, including a full on expansion. So while horse armour was a warning sign for things to come, Oblivion ALSO showcased the good side of paid post release content

      • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -32
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It is kinda funny how people have no issue paying for it all together as bundle, but separate it so people can pay for things individually is silly and everyone is suddenly offended?

        I would rather have a story for $10 and $1 outfits I can ignore, than to spend $30 on a story and bunch of cosmetics that don’t add to the game.

        This is just marketing, nothing more. They make more money forcing you to buy everything than letting you pick what you want.

        • Ogmios
          link
          fedilink
          English
          318 months ago

          Eh… It’s more than just paying, but that a lot of the stuff which is now a standard microtransaction used to be integrated into the total experience, so you’d unlock outfits and such for finding secrets or completing challenges. That sort of content was integral to the over all experience, not just an extra to tack on as an afterthought.

          • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -9
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That’s also just an affect on the market of people wanting more choice and not wanting to be forced to pay for stuff they don’t want.

            Of course it can be swung in a negative light too, because it affects developers bottom lines, and they always want the most money possible. CDPR is no different.

            • @snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              78 months ago

              The outcome of splitting the content is that there are a lot of people who want to have everything and they will end up paying far more for a la carte than for an expansion. The people who wouldn’t have bought the expansion still buy nothing, and pretty much nobody just buys a couple of things to save money.

              Microtransactions is a system designed to prey on completionist whales. Barely anyone only buys a couple of things and doesn’t end up spending more than $30 over time as the content is drip fed and the new hotness comes along to replace the old hotness. Those that don’t spend anything, or just buy one thing before catching on, weren’t going to spend the $30 anyway.

              It is false choice that negatively impacts the game experience.

              • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -48 months ago

                The outcome of splitting the content is that there are a lot of people who want to have everything and they will end up paying far more for a la carte than for an expansion

                So if they want the content, they can support the devs so they make more.

                The people who wouldn’t have bought the expansion still buy nothing, and pretty much nobody just buys a couple of things to save money.

                So no lose there, but they could buy an outfit if they liked it and want to support the dev.

                …… that’s actually the majority of gamers…… 2% of the player base accounts for most of the purchases, that means the other 98% is still buying stuff, just not everything. So that’s not even remotely close to reality, most people pick and choose the content, which is literally why this because a thing, because the market wanted it….

                • @snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  Unless the entire game is developed by an independent studio and is entirely funded on microtransactions, buying micro transactions is just there for more company profit on top of the regular game sales by stripping content out of a full release. It isn’t supporting the development.

                  The market didn’t want it.

                • metaStatic
                  link
                  fedilink
                  08 months ago

                  just like the market wants nothing but superhero movies? This doesn’t work anything like a free market. people would buy full games if they where available, devs just figured out they could drip feed the content and make significantly more money at the expense of a good product so you don’t get to choose the good product because it doesn’t exist. That’s not the market choosing crap it’s the market makers only providing crap.

                  • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    18 months ago

                    They still buy full games though, using old as seats to make new content for an “old” game is a great way to have more income come in. Most would probably prefer to make a new game, but that takes longer as well.

                    So if it’s a dlc a year at $15 for 4 years, or a game every 4 years for $60… what’s the difference in the end? Other than what you think is going on inside your head? It’s the same content, same price, same everything, you just get content yearly instead of every 4 years. Bonus for everyone since they can than use that money after the first year to maybe make the other better.

                • Ogmios
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -18 months ago

                  because the market wanted it

                  I can’t possibly roll my eyes any harder at this statement, with gaming companies practically competing to go under as fast as possible over the past decade.

                  • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -18 months ago

                    What…? Most people want more content more often with more options, not everyone wants a release every 4 years that’s the same content and story rehashed.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          People did have issues paying for it all together, back when they were called “expansion packs.”

          I don’t mind paying for more of the game. I do mind paying for fixes to a broken game. I don’t mind optional cosmetic upgrades, but I don’t like pay-to-win, even in single player (looking at you, Nintendo amiibos).

          But regardless, people are going to complain, and many of their complaints will be valid.

          • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            People had different issues with those, that was because online was a portion of it, and people thought devs were holding content back just to make more money. Obviously some did that, but they started painting every dev with that brush and they needed to adjust to save their bottom line from being affected.

            Every change has been a reactionary effort to adjust for the market changes and people suddenly not wanting what they just wanted a few years ago, and using it to their marketing advantage. Of course not everyone is going to be happy, it’s just funny that certain devs get defended for doing what everyone else does since their marketing gets eating up.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          You know, the way you phrase it I’d be fine. Only in your example, instead of 60 for it all, it is now 60 for 80% of the story, another 2x15 for the remainder, and 10 per Outfit.

        • Bone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          I think some people like to know when it ends. Microtransactions can make it seem endless. Once you’ve done that a few times it makes you want to know about as much as you can upfront.

        • @Don_alForno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 months ago

          The thing is, you actually get 30$ story and 5$ per outfit instead of a 30$ Expansion.

          And cosmetics do add to the game for a big part of the market.

      • @metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        Or if we’re talking Witcher 3, Hearts of Stone or Blood and Wine. Both of those had an amazing amount of content, well worth it.

    • @Breezy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      Ill be getting the Elden ring dlc at 40 dollars day one. Yeah im expecting the game to almost double in size.

    • Annoyed_🦀 A
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      Yeah that’s what remaster are for