HarryLime [any] to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 year agotitlehexbear.netimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1158arrow-down10
arrow-up1158arrow-down1imagetitlehexbear.netHarryLime [any] to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish17•edit-21 year agoI don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoWhat if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agothen start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
I don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
deleted by creator