• @Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    317 months ago

    both have worse UX than Signal. pretty much all except Signal are lacking on this front. OSS developers are allergic to a smooth UX in general

    • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      Signal’s UX is NOT good unless you want to expose your encrypted conversations to a smartphone (of which far from all can run a private OS). All because of no desktop registration. You either have to use inconvenient signal-cli, or an Android emulator which creates its own troubles.

    • @01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      xmpp has a variety of clients for desktop and mobile. You cannot dismiss them all as having worse ux than signal.

      The same is true for matrix.

    • Mr. Satan
      link
      17 months ago

      Dunno, it’s fine for me. As a messenging app it moslty gets out of my way and lets me communicate. It has all of the important functionality and creature comforts. Also, it already has some bloat (stories, whatever that crypto payment thing was/is). And the UI / UX is perfectly fine as is.

      Although, as a dev myself, I hate UX work, it’s just boring and unfulfilling. I get why UX is often an afterthought. First it has to be functional, anything beyond that is secondary.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Signals UX is no better than SMS apps. People I’ve tried to convert all say the same thing.

      ~~But it’s still the most secure/privacy minded messenger. ~~