• @Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Taiwan can’t get recognized despite its government being a founding member of the UN and folks surprised it’s contentious for Palestine to be recognized?

    • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      This outcome was by no means surprising, especially as it was not Palestine’s first application for membership and the US has even vetoed resolutions calling for an immediate ceasefire in the conflict between Israel and Palestine on several occasions. The difference to your comparison, however, is that Israel itself, unlike China, has no right of veto in the UN Security Council.

    • xor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      This is a bit misleading, though, Taiwan doesn’t want to be recognised as a nation, it wants to be recognised as the one legitimate government of China.

      Palestine just wants a seat at the table.

      • @MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        The problem with that is that Bejing makes it very clear that declaring independence would lead to an invasion of Taiwan. So for a long time most Taiwanese rather did want to keep the current basically independent status quo. However support for unification was low since Taiwan became a democracy. Since the Hong Kong protests and the extraction bill polls for independence show a majority supporting it though.

        Also Palestine has a seat on the table, just no vote, as a observer of the UN without being a member.

        • xor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Yeah, I didn’t want to jump too deep into the specifics of the Taiwanese stance since it’s quite complex, just wanted to note the difference between the two.

          seat at the table

          Yeah probably not the best way of phasing this, my bad!