Yeah, I suppose you’re right. To an extent, anyway. Sorry about that.
Still, the fact that there even is that interpretation in the first place to a common-enough frequency that it becomes taught at communication classes means that a LARGE, significant number of people have read it that way in the recent past.
Yeah, I suppose you’re right. To an extent, anyway. Sorry about that.
Still, the fact that there even is that interpretation in the first place to a common-enough frequency that it becomes taught at communication classes means that a LARGE, significant number of people have read it that way in the recent past.
Yeah. I can agree with you, vague and changing communication standards is annoying