@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 years agoSoupmander.xyzimagemessage-square195fedilinkarrow-up1822arrow-down17
arrow-up1815arrow-down1imageSoupmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square195fedilink
minus-square@Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoNormally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that. But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life. Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.
minus-square@Grass@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoTheoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
minus-square@explodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoThey consented by being there, just how we’ve consented to the state and capitalism.
Gazpacho, non-vegan.
But eating the rich is vegan, no?
Normally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that.
But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life.
Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.
Theoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
They consented by being there, just how we’ve consented to the state and capitalism.
That’s good enough for me.