• @Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    Are they really describing Valhalla as a 100-hour game? I spent that long on Origins, and Valhalla has way more to it.

    But overall a shorter AC game sounds great. I miss the days when even going for 100% took 45 hours instead of triple digits.

      • @qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Thing is the story didn’t stay compelling and fell off. The level barriers also felt super weird in a way that didn’t feel good. If they can make ass creed in in a similar way to ghost of Tsushima where every quest even side quests felt amazing, then I bet they’d really bring assassin’s creed back to the front of gaming

        • @Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Yeap. The quality of the quests were bad. Maybe good for a AssCreed game, but compared to modern counterparts in the genre, weak. Witcher 3 is the high bar for me.

      • @TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’ve been playing off and on for a month or two and feel like I’ve barely scratched the surface. I tend to get distracted though and just go off and fuck around, finding things.

    • teft
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I just played and finished valhalla for the first time and it took me ~70 hours to complete the main storyline. I didn’t 100% the maps just every now and then I’d go exploring.