• Liz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176 months ago

    Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

    • @rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -66 months ago

      Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

      But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

      • Liz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

          • Liz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Not in a binary sense, no. Such thinking isn’t useful, however. Zoos are a very strong net good fot animals, with minimal downsides (assuming the zoo keepers aren’t calloused assholes).

              • Liz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                Yes I’m well aware of the difficulties involved, but they can be mitigated, as your source explains. There’s more issues than just keeping them from going stir-crazy, but a proper zoo (the only kind I advocate for) will do their best to address all of them.

                  • Liz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    26 months ago

                    You and I have different moral systems and you think that hammering a deal-breaker for you will cause me to change my mind, when I’m perfectly okay with causing a small harm in order to secure a much much greater good.

      • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.