@SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world • 2 years agoGeorge Washington literally had skin cancer.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down114
arrow-up1736arrow-down1imageGeorge Washington literally had skin cancer.lemmy.world@SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squareFlying Squidlinkfedilink16•2 years agoEven if George Washington didn’t have skin cancer, what does that prove?
minus-square@CobaltLion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•2 years agoYeah, I don’t think a sample size of one really proves anything.
minus-squarethemeatbridgelinkfedilink1•2 years agoIt proves the OP was exceptionally stupid, and unlucky to have randomly picked as an example one of the four famous historical figures they know who happened to have skin cancer.
Even if George Washington didn’t have skin cancer, what does that prove?
Yeah, I don’t think a sample size of one really proves anything.
It proves the OP was exceptionally stupid, and unlucky to have randomly picked as an example one of the four famous historical figures they know who happened to have skin cancer.