@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 2 years agoInternet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1380arrow-down1external-linkInternet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.com@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink2•2 years ago Their distribution of books is completely legal. Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour. You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
minus-square@nintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 years agoOh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink1•2 years agoWhat did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.
You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
Oh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
What did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.