@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 months agoInternet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1379arrow-down1external-linkInternet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.com@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink2•3 months ago Their distribution of books is completely legal. Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour. You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
minus-square@nintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglish-1•3 months agoOh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
minus-squareFaceDeerlinkfedilink1•3 months agoWhat did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.
You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
Oh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
What did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.