• utopianrevolt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    an opinion cannot be wrong. but it also cannot be right. you make a fair point with what you’re saying. the dev is already planning on a single time purchase, but a sub option is definitely not “morally wrong.”

    • @moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 year ago

      It can be morally wrong depending on the person’s visions. It’s not that this vision is wrong or right. It’s a personal one. Nobody did this vision mandatory.

      • @SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Although I do not agree with your opinion above, but I think your opinion is valid and you don’t deserve the downvotes.

        My opinion is that Sync and Lemmy are two different things with two different philosophies. Yes they are interconnected, but they are both separate entities, and it’s not like Sync is built off of Lemmy’s source code. The dev should get compensated for the time and resources he put into the source code of Sync, and if ads is a way to contribute to that, then so be it.